STANDARD OPERATING PRACTICE.



INTRODUCING - STANDARD OPERATING PRACTICE - ....................CLICK HERE TO GO STRAIGHT TO OUR DOCUMENT STORE.................... CLICK HERE TO GO STRAIGHT TO OUR BESPOKE PROTOCOL SECTION.


If you have a validation requirement, then make certain the validation is complete and thorough. Validation documentation must cascades from the URS to the PQ, with each document properly references and scoped.

Make certain that your validation is up to regulatory compliance requirements by ensuring that the complete chain is in place.





The Wall Street Journal published an article informing all that pharmaceutical “manufacturing techniques lag behind those of potato-chip and laundry-soap makers.” The same article correlated the rise in recalls with quality problems and noted that despite fines in excess of US$500 million for manufacturing failures, acceptable levels of quality were still not being achieved...................a Question for you - - - -Many leading analytical balance manufacturers provide built-in "auto calibration" features in their balances. Are such auto-calibration procedures acceptable instead of external performance checks? If not, then what should the schedule for calibration be?.....................................Answer (1) The auto-calibration feature of a balance may not be relied upon to be FDA compliant to the extent of not requiring an external performance check (211.68). For a scale with a built-in auto-calibrator to be FDA compliant, we recommend that external performance checks be performed on a periodic basis, using a standard operating practice SOP. Less frequently as compared to a scale without this feature. The frequency of performance checks depends on the frequency of use of the scale and the criticality and tolerance of the process or analytical step. Note that all batches of a product manufactured between two successive verifications would be affected should the check of the auto-calibrator reveal a problem. Additionally, the calibration of an auto-calibrator should be periodically verified--a common frequency is once a year--using National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-traceable standards or NIST-accredited standards in use in other countries.


STANDARD OPERATING PRACTICE


SOP for Spreadsheet Creation.

Why does something as simple as a spreadsheet figure in so many regulatory citations? Good question; and at times a difficult one to answer. When you ask a group of compliance personnel the same question you will be informed that Excel cannot be validated because it does not seal the original copy (of the spreadsheet), allows the original to be modified and has an audit trail that can be disabled. All true, but none of these problems interfere with your ability to validate that the spreadsheet is fit for purpose. They only preclude you from using the spread sheet as a compliant repository for any data that has to be store in compliance with 21 CFR Part 11.
If the spreadsheet is signed off and dated by the user, their supervisor and QA, it becomes regulatory acceptable data stored in hardcopy, and Part 11 does not apply.
After numerous requests for this, we have launched our brand new SOP for Spreadsheet Creation to cover these and other known target points that the regulators consistently hone into as soon as they find that spreadsheets are being used. Use this Spreadsheet Creation SOP to ensure that you create spreadsheets that are validatable. Then use our spreadsheet validation pack to validate them.

SOP for Spreadsheet Creation. -- $125.00

Quantity


SOP Equipment Validation.

The SOP for Computer Equipment Validation continues to be an extremely popular document. This document leads you through the validation process, from the URS to the final P2Q.


Purchase your copy now at Special Price of $22.00.

Quantity

Validation Risk Assessment (Issue11.) -- $125.00

The Risk and Part 11 Validation Risk Assessment (VRA) protocol is becoming the most important document in the validation train. The VRA reassures the regulators that you have looked at specific equipment functionality and considered the appropriate level of validation that is required. You have also considered various aspects of its use and the implications of any malfunctions. From the results of this exercise the scope of all validation activity can and must be justified. This is a robust and simple to execute document, one that will lead you through the process and deliver a result that can be used as the foundation for your validation activities.
This VRA now includes the assessment table for categorizing and documenting the new 21 CFR Part 11 guidance ruling on what predicate data must be stored in a Part compliant system, along with the new broadsheet to establish your new database of part 11 records. (now mandatory).

Quantity