The FDA Quality Plan must start with Primary Requirements (PR). However these PR’s inevitably will have Support Requirements (SR) and further along the line Ancillary Requirements (AR). It is essential that all these requirements are identified as early in the procurement stage as is possible. Failure to identify and consequently not provision for; SR’s and ER’s, has and still is one of the main causes of validation program delays and cost overruns. We always recommend that companies involved in URS authoring develop their own exhaustive check list of all possible SR’s and AR’s. This check list can then be used by all persons involved in authoring FDA Quality Plans and User Requirements Specification documents; as an infallible aid de memoir.
The Validation task ends with the PQ; which is required to verify that all the requirements as detailed in the URS have been challenged, inspected and or tested in accordance with and results obtained confirm complete compliance with their respective documented acceptance criterias.
(i.e. no URS; equates to no content for your PQ = flawed validation). In between are the FDA Quality (Validation) Plan (VP or QP), Validation Risk Assessment (VRA) and the Design Qualification (DQ). The regulatory authorities require these documents to be in place with the dates for content approval and execution of running consecutively.
The devil is in the detail: The User Requirements Specification (URS) must be fully detailed and include all aspects of procurement; such as usage, maintainability, calibration, cleaning, utility requirements, facility requirements, user training, support documentation, support engineering drawings, software programs and all the attendant SOP’s that are required in the execution of the these and all other GMP specified tasks. There must be no surprised or shocks when the machine / software arrives, all requirements (yes even the most obscure details) must be anticipated and engineered for.
If you tackle the URS in a professional manor with your colleague’s and peers, you should develop a sound company reviewed and approved document that will guide, develop and produce a comprehensive User Requirements Specification (URS); that will prove to be worth its weight in gold.
The FDA have stated that over 70% of validation problems stem from the procurement not being properly detailed and or managed. Get the URS correct and you are well set to execute your validation task smoothly, compliantly, on time and on cost. The execution of your VRA defines and authorizes your whole approach to the validation of any software used in the or system undergoing qualification. Software used in this type of equipment can normally be validated by testing its functionality against the requirements documented in the URS document along with verification that the software was developed using an approved FDA quality plan appropriate for the GMP requirements for this class of software.
It must be getting rather obvious now that the documentation required for compliant validation does indeed form a chain, with each link firmly supported by the previous link and forming a sound footing for the next link in the in the progress towards qualification.
FDA Quality Plan is defined in the manual which arrives with you in DVD
format, complete with a search facility that enables you at any time to
have the benefit of over thirty years of validation experience and
wisdom, right beside you. Enabling you to access references, instantly
down load test scripts, and above all, have access to the best FDA
Compliant document templates available anywhere.
If you have background knowledge in pharmaceuticals and are reasonably competent, the Definitive Validation Requirements Manual will do the rest for you by detailing all validation requirements. If you are in the Pharmaceutical / Biotechnological / API / Medical Device, industries or whether your in any of the engineering streams that are involved with these industries, the Definitive Validation Manual will enable you to:- • Get started in pharmaceutical validation. • Gain promotion in the industry. • Become dual skilled. • Get into the highest paid section of the industry. The cost of the FDA Compliant, Definitive Validation Requirements Manual, will be recouped in the first few weeks, it will then go on to show a massive return on your original investment. An investment that you will never ever regret.
June 2015, The FDA is to Create a New Drug Quality Office: The agency said the new office will publish a 'dashboard' of quality findings that will show the range of metrics, good and bad, achieved by the industry.........In September 2003, The Wall Street Journal published an article informing all that pharmaceutical “manufacturing techniques lag behind those of potato-chip and laundry-soap makers.” The same article correlated the rise in recalls with FDA quality problems and noted that despite fines in excess of US$500 million for manufacturing failures, acceptable levels of quality were still not being achieved.
For Your Security We are Now TLS 1.2 Compliant
The Standard Operating Procedure attached to this generic design qualification protocol, will chapter by chapter, take you through the task of raising a fully detailed document. The main body is split into fourteen tables, each one probing the design requirements and standards for the individual requirement. Safety and security along with user operability are very detailed. The document will lead you through all these design aspects allowing you to delete some you feel are not important to your equipment. It is an easy document to use and will ensure that you’re DQ’s are relevant, up to date and easy to execute. Practically all the requirements are in table form. Allowing fast and clearly presented results to be obtained
This Validation, Risk & Requirements Plan (VrrP) is one document designed specifically to replace three. The contents of the three original documents were completely revised and edited into a more compact and interactive format. Resulting in the document becoming notably easier to use and quicker to review and amend. This new format will make a very significant difference to the man hours required to produce and execute these documents. There will also be a very noticeable reduction in the time required for the reviewing and approving tasks. This new document titled the VrrP replaces the VP, VRA & URS and now compliments our equally new 4Q Protocol, which integrates the DQ/IQ/OQ/PQ into one document.
4Q Equipment Validation Protocol (4Q-Equip) has been designed
specifically to replace four standard protocols. By taking the
contents of the four protocol and carefully weaving them into one notably easy
to use protocol, we have made a significant advance in the task of streamlining
validation documentation by reducing protocol numbers by close to 75%. The
new bang up to date 4Q protocol replaces the DQ, IQ, OQ & PQ and now
compliments our equally new VrrP Protocol. By integrating the old style
DQ/IQ/OQ/PQ into one 4Q document there will be enormous savings in man hours in
the authoring, reviewing, updating and approving tasks.
For everyone's convenience, it is still written in word
This quite unique two
document package is all that is required to fully validate; to cGMP standards,
equipment used in a regulated facility. A lot of effort has gone into ensuring
that repetitive instructions and actions have been designed out and innovative
and intuitive risk-based methodologies have been incorporated.
Both documents are prefaced with a methods' Standard Operating Practice (SOP) document. These SOP’s lead you through the task of converting these highly detailed templates into your very own company bespoke protocols. The hyperlinks and cross-references within the package are; not only unique but also highly cost-effective and intuitive to use. Each document is preloaded with the test scripts (complete with acceptance criteria). All test and inspection scripts are written in MS word, to facilitate simple editing of text, layout, tables and schematics.