The security of SOP's
mandate that all processes and methods used to produce a regulated product must
be documented and be company approved.
In the majority of cases the end user wants the SOP in hard copy. The original approved SOP will reside in
a safe and secure location in change control (this is a regularly audited
depends on your company practices and procedure (which also must be documented
and approved) as to whether the SOP is in electronic format with or without e
signatures. The security is by
password it one instance and physical security in the other; either way to be
FDA compliant the original approved SOP must be held securely, with controlled
access available to authorised persons only. It is a secure system; with many
approved and serialised copies in circulation and the master, under lock and
key, where would you start to make unauthorised changes?
control must at all times (another regularly audited point) know the location of
all the SOP copies in circulation and must have the capability to be able to
recall them for incorporation of amendments or destruction.
auditor I have audited for these features for many years, I have never found a
case of unauthorised SOP changes. I
have found many cases where the operators failed to follow the SOP. This always puzzles me; why shoot your
self in the foot over something so obvious, but a glance through the warning
letters shows this is still one of the major causes of FDA citations.
The Importance of Correct Procurement.
analysis of the end user's priorities, in procurement priorities, is made the
importance of the equipment / programs being validateable ranks at number two
out of ten. Second only to
delivery; with cost ranking around sixth. This has been true in over 80% of all
cases we have been involved with.
the-would-be purchaser, it gives enormous reassurance to know that regulatory
compliant validation protocols and plans are supplied. They are often willing to pay a 15 to 30
percent surcharge for these documents.
If a consultant is hired to produce the full suite of validation
documents (8/9 documents) considerable costs are involved. However it is the question; is the
system / program actually capable of being validated? That makes people hesitate. I doubt (after over twenty years as an
auditor) if there is any pharmaceutical company that has not at some time had to
abandon new programs or equipment for these reasons.
The FDA have
actually stated that 70% of validation problems are directly related to none
compliant procurement methods.
comments about you having to validate the equipment or program are completely
erroneous. The end user has that
task; your task is to ensure that your product is validatable. That means in all ways it must be
compliant with the applicable directives in cGMP. On our site we carry further details of
all these requirements.
Some of Our Current Fast Moving Documents.
Software Validation SOP (Issue-2) -- $22.00
Software Validation Master Plan (issue-2) -- $115.00
Software Validation Risk Assessment (Issue 2) -- $125.00
Software User Requirements Specification. (Issue 2) -- $115.00
Software Validation Plan (Issue 2) -- $89.00
Software Design Qualification. (Issue 2) -- $89.00
Software Installation Qualification. (Issue 2) -- $89.00
Software Operational Qualification. (Issue 2) -- $89.00
Software Performance Qualification. (Issue 2) -- $89.00
Software Validation Package (Issue 1) -- $699.00
A recent warning letter demonstrates just how few companies use a Gap Analysis to validate that they are compliant. CAPA discrepancies continue to be the biggest single source of problems. However the daddy of them all recently has been a well known company that had carefully documented the levels of experience and educational standards required for various GMP sensitive roles (In accordance with GMP), only for the FDA to find the persons in these jobs were not qualified properly. (click here to read)
Do use a Gap Analysis and avoid these embarrassing events.
Gap Analysis Tool (Issue 2.) -- $115.00
Validation Risk Assessment (Issue10.) -- $125.00
This popular Validation Risk Assessment (VRA) has now been edited and enlarged to include Part 11 assessment tables for you to use in classifying which of your predicate records require to be stored in compliance with 21 Part 11, and which do not. It also includes an Excel spreadsheet to allow you to establish a permanent record of all such judgements, as is now mandated by the regulatory authorities.